On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 11:13 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > well... if the root is brand spanking new.. why would it need a sync? > > Because it _is_ brand spanking new (and thus unclean from a RAID point > of view)? Why does that matter? The parts of it we've written data out to are supposed to be in sync already. The resync should only be making the parts that aren't in use yet identical. -- Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
