Re: Requires vs Requires.private ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 14:46 -0800, Denis Leroy wrote:
> So what is up with the "Requires.private" entries in various pkgconfig
> .pc files ? Most mock fc5 builds are currently failing because of a
> missing dependency between libX11-devel and libxau-devel. Culprit seems
> to be :
> 
> bash-3.00# grep -i requires /usr/lib/pkgconfig/x11.pc
> Requires: xproto kbproto inputproto
> Requires.private: xau xdmcp

If A Requires.private: B, that means libA links to libB, but apps/libs
that link to libA does not have to link to libB (when linking
dynamically on platforms that support library dependencies, like Linux).

It should not affect -devel packages. 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a sword-wielding Catholic farmboy searching for his wife's true killer. 
She's a wealthy hip-hop archaeologist fleeing from a Satanic cult. They fight 
crime! 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux