On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 22:12 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > So it mean "subscribe to fedora-devel-list it is waste of time" ? I'm sorry, I don't follow this? > > It was a scripted rebuild that had a few flaws. 1) the > > script failed to catch noarch packages that aren't built w/ gcc, and 2) > > the changelog bump had 'gcj' instead of 'gcc' in it due to not being > > changed after the java rebuilds. > > So you know now (with my help or not) using this script it is bad > methodology (If it is not clear a'm talking only about this) > Consequences: instead reply for not sending any kind of answers better > will be spend this time on rething rebuilding methodology. I really don't know what kind of answers you were looking for. I explained why the were upgraded, and why the changelog had an invalid entry. What more can I say? > I'm not asking how scripted rebuild work. I'm asking using very simple > and elementar questions. If you don't want anwer on this or not want > chage this stupid scripts simple better not wast (my an your) time for > reply :> Again, I answered the questions I saw: Q: Why were noarch packages rebuilt? A: The script I used failed to check for noarch. Q: Why was 'gcj' referenced in the changelog for perl packages? A: The script had an old entry used when dealing w/ java packages. I did not see any further questions in the email I replied to, and I tried to answer them in the most honest way possible. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
