On Sat, December 17, 2005 3:28 pm, Stephen Pollei said: >> That would be slick. > It would be slicker if only the BT app could use those ports and you > didn't have to dynamically punch holes in the firewall. Yes, but you may have to punch holes in the firewall _as well_. I don't think selinux security context would override any local firewall rules which (as they stand today) lock down all ports that aren't explicitly enabled for a service. Sean -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
