Yeah that rebuild was almost as much wasted energy as writing a mail about a rebuild that wasted energy (or replying on a mail about a rebuilt that wasted energy) ;-) - Erwin On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:58 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Dnia 17-12-2005, sob o godzinie 10:40 -0500, Build System napisał(a): > [..] > > logwatch-7.1-4.1 > > ---------------- > > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - rebuilt > [..] > > mailcap-2.1.19-1.1 > > ------------------ > > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - rebuilt > > > > man-pages-cs-0.16-5.1 > > --------------------- > > * Fri Dec 09 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - rebuilt > [..and all other man-pages-*..] > > Sorry but what is the sense rebuilding this noarch packages. > IMO this only waste of time and energy. > > > perl-Devel-Symdump-2.03-20.1 > > ---------------------------- > > * Fri Dec 16 2005 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > > - rebuilt for new gcj > [..and all other perl modules. Specialy packed in noarch packages..] > > Next: how chages in libgcj affects perl modules ??? specialy noarch perl > modules ? :-o > This next plain waste of time and energy for supply build systems. > > kloczek > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
