On 12/15/05, Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 16:42 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > On 12/15/05, Davide Bolcioni <db-fedora@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > There are some killer-apps built using Mono. Fedora should get cheeky > > > > and see what they can get away. > > > > > > Myself, I would welcome equivalents of the above apps NOT using mono > > > instead, but that's just me. How many virtual machines and frameworks > > > are we supposed to install ? > > > > > > > Actually, I am wondering about this topic from some time, that is, > > what is done in Beagle with Mono that is so difficult to be done in C > > or C++ ? > > Its not beagle the app that is problematic, it is mono the framework. > However beagle doesn't work without mono, so shipping beagle without > mono is not an option. What I think he was asking was what functionality does Mono have that makes it easier to develop in Mono rather than C or C++. My answer to that question is that I believe there is nothing but Mono being a Novell/Ximian developed env they are using Beagle (as well as F-Spot and a couple of others) as a proof of concept to prove that its a good platform etc. and also as a sort of if you want this you have to also have this. P -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list