On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 21:29 +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > 1. wrong list for this discussion - the mirrors discussion list is more > > appropriate > > 2. you'd need the mirrors to use a consistent script in order to ensure > > that the files were retrieved in a correct order such that the semaphore > > file was retrieved last. This has proved to be harder to get folks to do > > than you would expect. > > 1. okay - i've been looking for the mirrors discussion list and can't > seem to find it - any chance somebody could post a link os something? > It's a private list for mirror admins only. From the way you were speaking I thought you were already a mirror admin. > 2. I can't imagine this would be a problem for the official mirrors? Then you need a better imagination. > I > believe it's a matter of finding a solution (simple protocol if you > will) that allows the mirrors to provide an even better service without > too much fuss. It could also be a great way for a central > (fedoraproject.org or something) status page that could easily poll the > official mirrors for status and such. that's what bouncer is for. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
