On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:25 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: *snip* > > I don't think there really are any legitimate reasons to set *anything* > in the Pango RC file, much less set things differently for 32 and 64 > bits. OK. I'm not familiar with the goals of the pango project etc. but you clearly are, so then I need to assume that you are correct. The reason why they might need to be different in my mind is for the difference in path location of modules depending upon arch - namely /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 Currently - if you set /etc/pangorc or ~/.pangorc and set a ModulesPath in it - unless I'm misunderstanding, 64 and 32 bit pango would both try to use it which would cause a problem. gnome bugzilla 129540 which you references looks like it addresses that issue, so I added myself to that cc list and will wait to see what comes from it. > > Your scheme might be a bit better than what we have currently, but it > isn't a lot better (IMO), and I don't think it's worth a lot of pain and > churn to switch to it. OK. What I'll do with the rpm packaging for the graphite pango wrapper then is do absolutely nothing in the %post scriptlets and put in a README.fedora that tells the user how to set it up in Fedora if they want to use the modules. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
