Re: gstreamer 0.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> Even plugins are divided into three parts. Good: well written plugins
> without legal/lincensing issues. Bad: well written plugins with either
> patent/licence problems. Ugly: ugly code. once cleaned up wil go into
> good or bad depending on relevant issues. 

Almost correct.  Ugly is the package containing good code but ugly
licensing/legal issues, which could prompt distributors not to ship.
Bad is what contains code that hasn't passed a QA check yet.

See http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/splitup.html for more
explanation.

Thomas


Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
"Don't worry, Joey, it's unisex."
"Maybe you need sex, I just had some a couple of days ago !"
"No, no, U-N-I-sex !"
"Well, I ain't gonna say no to that !"
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux