On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:59:34PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:51 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On 12/8/05, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes. Because I'm doing cache operations, not repository operations. Or > > > > rather, that's what I thought I was doing, so it would be intuitive to > > > > me. > > > > > > So for completeness what your saying is that you think > > > yum clean packages should clean all packages from all enabled and > > > disabled repos by default? > > > > > > and yum clean headers should clean all headers from all enabled and > > > disabled repos by default? > > > > Well, I actually think it should. > > > Seriously? That seems completely backward to me. > > it's like saying rsync --exclude=/some/path should not actually exclude > that path. > > or that a disabled samba share shouldn't ACTUALLY be disabled. Bad analogies. We're talking about cache data. I don't even understand why is it necessary to gather repositories configuration. Don't forget that current behaviour makes it unable to delete cache for repositories no longer configurated. Unless by hand. -- lfr 0/0 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
