Warren Togami wrote:
Brian Gerst wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orion Poplawski (orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
Is there a particular criteria for which i386 devel packages end up the
in the x86_64 tree?
Generally, the LSB set. There is discussion of expanding it, but
that will require some work.
Bill
In order to compile wine on x86_64 I had to install the X and openssl
devel packages from the i386 repo.
You folks might be happier rebuilding i386 SRPMS on your x86_64 by using
mock. It is almost fully automated.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
I'm not building it through RPM. Wine has the necessary logic to
compile as 32-bit even on x86_64. All that is missing is the symbolic
links from libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.x for the 32-bit libs, which the i386
devel packages provide.
--
Brian Gerst
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
