Stupid (?) lib64 questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have an x86 system, running only official FC4 + Extras, on which I am
seeing a few packages that are referencing "/usr/lib64":

(1) - php*-5.0.4-10.5, which now is trying to find the mysql module
under /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib.

(2) - My Fedora Extras blogtk-1.1-4.fc4 package, built on hammer1.f.r.c,
contains files that are installed under /usr/lib64.

Although the latter doesn't appear to affect proper functioning, the
former is wreaking havoc now that I am testing a package that uses
php-mysql, since it is looking for /usr/lib64/php4/modules/mysql.so and
not finding it there.  (I can fix this with a symbolic link.)  My
understanding is that the former situation is probably a bug, which I'll
file, but what is up with the latter?  Is it to be expected that FE
stuff will sometimes end up with %{_libdir} evaluating to /usr/lib64 on
build machines?  Clues delivered gently would be helpful.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux