Le mercredi 30 novembre 2005 à 15:53 -0500, seth vidal a écrit : > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 21:49 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mercredi 30 novembre 2005 à 15:38 -0500, seth vidal a écrit : > > > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 15:36 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:33:09PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > > > I suspect the 'interesting' parts are when your yum 'distroupgrade' > > > > > > > plugin starts doing things that are totally unrelated to package > > > > > > > management. > > > > > > I dunno -- "package management" can be a pretty big umbrella. You mean, > > > > > > like, converting LVM, that sort of thing? > > > > > Converting LVM, removing references to /dev/psaux from various files, etc. > > > > > > > > So, yeah, "interesting" in the famous chinese curse sense. But given that > > > > that stuff has to happen somewhere, any particular reason why not here? > > > > > > > > > > it's a live system. > > > > > > much greater risk of losing data and destroying a running process. > > > > So what ? > > Make a firstboot package which runs at init 1 > > I believe we have that > > it's called anaconda Nah Anaconda requires you to get an installation image somewhere and burn it to a CD/DVD. A firstboot package would just add an entry to the usual boot menu, and work even on a CD-less system. Plus a firstboot could be split into "manage partitions" "manage lvms" ... tools, while anaconda only knows about update process. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
