On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:57:14PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 11/30/05, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Excepting the specific special cases like LVM migration (which, y'know, > > we're past already), is it significantly more risky than when yum does any > > package updates? > Are you saying that this project should officially state that people > still running rhl or fc1 systems should NOT attempt an upgrade to > fc5+? Is that what you are saying? Not necessarily; while the bulk of the special-casing could be done in the theoretical distroupgrade plugin, there could be certain cases where the online upgrade plugin would bail and say "sorry, I can't help you; you'll need the full installer". Or, maybe there comes a point where drawing a line is reasonable. SGI does that all the time, and look where that's gotten them.... :) :) :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
