Re: udev alpha testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: udev alpha testing
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe.alfaro@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:32:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <438CAC83.3010300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <438C656B.2080701@xxxxxxxxxx> <6f6293f10511291124v44f27863p8e5cca2a4973d2a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438CAC83.3010300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> why with selinux=0 ? is it slower with selinux enabled?

It seems policy 2.X is having some trouble with udev.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- udev alpha testing
  - From: Harald Hoyer
- Re: udev alpha testing
  - From: Felipe Alfaro Solana
- Re: udev alpha testing
  - From: dragoran

Prev by Date: Re: udev alpha testing
Next by Date: Re: fc5 goals
Previous by thread: Re: udev alpha testing
Next by thread: Re: udev alpha testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux