On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:09 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 11/26/05, Deji Akingunola <dakingun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I remember someone proposed it in the very early days of extras > > (before the bugzilla system), but no one ever step up to sponsor it, > > and I guess the contributor got discouraged . > > Please.... find the post me to the post in the fedora-extras-list > archive where the submission request was made, because I certaintly > can't find it. I don't think it ever was in the list - but I do remember under the old old system, someone had added themselves to the wiki as looking for a sponsor stating that was something they were interested in maintaining. AFAIK a spec file was never submitted for review though. -=- I personally like smartpm - it had a few quirks in it last time I used it, but it was good. I personally don't need it though - it's strength is that it makes it a little easier to mix repositories by allowing you to set different repos at different priorities (over-riding version and release) while allowing you to fine tune it with specific packages. However, I do not mix repositories anymore - if its not in extras, either I just build it myself for my private use - or I build it and submit it. So I don't need what smartpm is particularly good at anymore. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
