On 11/27/2005 06:38:28 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:33:16PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 22:53 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote: > > > no, I don't want to hear any bitching and moaning about this, that's how > > > it is. > > > > At some point we should change this to only pull in as few packages as > > really needed, but that also comes with quite some calculation cost. > > why isn't the way it's currently being done correct? We've gone round > and round on this and its always come down to how to handle globs of > commands. Sometimes less is more. Why should a system be polluted with i386 packages, if the user does not need them?
Indeed. But that should be considered by the repo creator. If there is no need for a i386 variant of package X then X.i386 should not be in the x86_64 repo.
Regards, Willem Riede. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
