On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:17:20PM -0500, Build System wrote: > alsa-lib-1.0.10rf-1 > * Thu Nov 24 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.0.10rf-1 > - new upstream version > > alsa-utils-1.0.10rf-1 > * Thu Nov 24 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.0.10rf-1 > - new upstream version > - added alias for snd-azx Please don't use rc, rf etc. in the version field. alsa tradition will certainly bring an alsa 1.0.10a, and the package of it will be called 1.0.10rfa? Better is 1.0.10rc<N>: alsa-1.0.10-<anything you like>_rc<N> 1.0.10 final: alsa-1.0.10-<anything you like +1> 1.0.10a: alsa-1.0.10a-... "anything you like" can be 0, or anything you like ... Since this is rawhide/FC5t1 please undo the versioning, thanks! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158859 -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpdlIEeRJkB1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
