On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 17:42 +0100, Joachim Frieben wrote: > I am a very user myself. So your statement is based on pure speculation. > Btw, this is the first time that I hear about repository interdependencies. > Things get somewhat ridiculous here. What a lot of people don't realize is that the users on this list aren't really the target audience of Fedora. Fedora is programmed to cater to the users we don't really hear from. The ones that aren't beta testers, aren't deep system hackers, etc.. They're the ones that just use our software and when something breaks, they're usually the ones that go to forums or their lug to figure it out, or write a silly slam on some review site. Think about the target user for Gnome. Thats basically where the UI is going for the tools that Red Hat creates for Fedora. In this case, I agree with Jeremy. The users that really would care about disabling certain repos can easily do it in the conf files, whereas exposing this to other end users would be confusing and misleading and could cause real problems. Inter-repo dependencies do exist. In particular with Livna and Fedora Extras. Now we can talk about Livna being full of forbidden items all we want, but the fact is that it gets used and used a lot. Other such deps happen as well with other popular 3rd party repos. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
