On 11/26/2005 10:35:27 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:32:17PM +0000, Willem Riede wrote: > >that it shouldn't include language-specific packages. Some people think > >it should. With multiple repositories, should it include all of the > >packages from all of the repositories? What happens if there are > That one is solvable by calling it "everything from core" and having a [...] But if it is just "everything from core", what's the argument for having it, then? From what I've heard from people who like having Everything, they want it because they want every possibility pre-installed -- which this wouldn't be. It'd just be "a bunch of stuff that's useful in a core distribution, the majority of which isn't ever going to be useful or relevant to any one specific installation".
Having "everything from every repo that I identified" installed is not a safe option to provide. Many repos hold updates to core packages that should not be blindly chosen.
And frankly, I'd vote for not having an everything option at all, because your qualification of the majority not being useful or relevant to the user defenitely holds independant of how wide an everything net you cast.
The only reason users go for it IMHO is that they they don't know what they want or need. They end up with stuff installed they don't know they have, even though they might use it if they knew. With yum it is so easy and convenient to just pull in a package that you want to try once you learn about its existance, that I don't see the value of speculatively pre-installing.
But if there is going to be an "everything", again IMHO, it should be limited to core.
Regards, Willem Riede. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
