On 11/26/05, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:56 +0200, Marius Andreiana wrote: > > It seems that with Everything install option gone in FC5 test1, one > > cannot install all packages from CD. I'm still downloading it so I > > cannot test by myself yet, but Jeremy's reply suggests it won't be added > > back (how are the package groups handled with multiple repositories?). > > Everything is a bit of a disaster in a lot of ways. Some people think > that it shouldn't include language-specific packages. Some people think > it should. With multiple repositories, should it include all of the > packages from all of the repositories? What happens if there are > conflicts? And that's in addition to mattdm's helpful comments in the > bug :) > > > In previous Fedora versions, there was also the Details button for a > > package group, is this gone too? There one could have manually selected > > additional packages, and this is a solution. > > As the screen says, it's just a temporary placeholder for now :) > Details will be coming back, although not exactly as it was before. > > > If both these options are gone, then should the packages which aren't > > installed by default if all groups are selected be moved to Fedora > > Extras? > > In a lot of cases, packages which aren't listed in the comps file at all > (or aren't a dependency of something) perhaps _should_ move to Extras. > In addition, I think there probably are packages which should move > somewhere into the comps file. File bugs against comps for things that > should be listed and aren't. I've opened bug #174244 on comps and attached a list of all the rpms that did not get installed. This list contains 999 rpms! Something is seriously wrong here... Best regards, Bernd. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
