On 11/21/05, Mike Hearn <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you want to provide binary extensions,
> notice that the mx folks provide an RPM for the UCS2 build and one for the
> UCS4 build.
Ouch ... how are users expected to know which they have?
If you are creating an uber-RPM that's supposed to work on 50 different platforms, then the burden is on you to provide two libs that are compiled against a UCS2 and a UCS4 build of Python. Then you use a highly unmotivated trick to determine which Python was configured with during the installation/configure stage (post package install).
--
-jeff
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
