Peter Lemenkov wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Mike A. Harris wrote:
I (and many others, definitely) haven't neither i810-based cars, nor
others from this list. So question is - why I enforced to install all
of these dri-modules? We can simply split this package into a bunch
of little packages, for example mesa-libGL, mesa-dri-i810,
mesa-dri-i830, etc. It''s not a hard work, IMO.
This is a long term possible feature. In order for this to happen, here
is what needs to be done:
Looks like we are talking abount different things, Mike.
For splitting Mesa-package, we don't need to submit even single line of
code into mainstream Mesa-sourcetree. All we need is to provide
additional subpackages in the SPEC-file (look at attachment, where I
provide a patch to the mesa.spec, used for building FC's mesa* rpm's).
All we need is to properly patch SPEC-file.
In short: No. Absolutely not. ;o)
For the longer version, please reread my first email. As I stated
therein, this is not due to it being technically impossible to do.
It is a concious and intentional choice that all Mesa drivers are
provided in one package right now, and I plan on keeping it that way
at least until all of the items I outlined in the first email are
met.
Hope that clarifies things. ;o)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
