Re: init observations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Răzvan Corneliu C.R. "d3vi1" VILT" <razvan.vilt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Then again, one that does not have all these to worry about, would be
> fine having X start before network and LDAP.

And this is the point, one should not pay for something they don't use.
We have two alternatives to get that:
  1. Have the init be flexible enough so that it can easily start X before
      the network if at all possible.

  2. Have an API so that software can wait for things. This way you can
      start X, and if it reaches some code that needs networking (for XDMCP
      for example), it can just say "wait for networking to be up".

-- 
Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Lattica, Inc.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux