On 11/18/05, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > would you care to explain your opinion? I find them functional "enough" and good looking "enough" (except for some minor defects that I have already filed bugs for but do not require the cursors to be replaced with a different concept). I don't see why colorless mouse icons are automatically better than colored icons. We don't use the high constrast black&white menu/desktop icons by default. I didn't read anything in your opinion that was could not be summarized as "personal taste". And with all matters of personal taste...opinions differ and there will be no right answer. And i certainly do not think that the red hat logo on the desktop that we have enjoyed for so long, is any more appropriate or even more informational than a separate fedora project logo. I think its very important and very informational to be able to distinguish which distribution you are using at a glance at the default desktop even with windows open obscuring the wallpaper. The fedora logo on the gnome panel finally makes a clearly visible distinction that someone is on a fedora desktop and not on a rhel system. As a matter of function and informative content.. any fedora specific logo is a change for the better. And there is absolutely no point in arguing about the style of the logo.. matters of style have no right answer and the style of the logo isn't going to change. -jef"suckered into yet another logo thread.... I should be forcible removed from the mailinglists to prevent responding to another logo thread"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
