On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 13:08 +0100, Stefan Held wrote: > > AFAIK the CDDL is a BSD Style License. More MPL like. > So where exactly do you come to > the conclusion that Software written under this license can't be used > in a GPL'ed environment? (compiled) kernel modules are generally seen as a derived work of the kernel, especially when integrated with the kernel. The GPL requires derived works to be GPL licensed; not "compatible" like BSD, but GPL licensed. The GPL also requires that when you ship 2 pieces of software together that are highly interdependent as one whole (even when they're not derived works), that the entire whole is GPL licensed. Yes the GPL is quite viral.... > > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
