On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 10:11 -0500, Dimi Paun wrote: > From: "Gilboa Davara" <gilboada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > How the API will look in the end, is less important at this point. > > Gilboa > > Sure, but that's the topic of this thread :) I'm not claiming > it's the most important aspect, but it's important and it doesn't > seem to be addressed by any of the current proposals. > > -- > Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Lattica, Inc. > Agreed. However, there seem to be bigger discussion (in the "init observation" thread) about whether there's a need to replace the init system to begin with. I agree that the init.d system is very old and slow. However, I rather not have a C/CPP based system that I cannot edit in 3 seconds, which I want to change something. Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
