Re: Dependency problems not reported

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 10:41 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 11/16/05, Steve G <linux_4ever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm using x86_64, not sure if that makes a difference.
> shrug... HelixPlayer is not in the 64bit tree.. and it is
> self-consitently packaged in the 32bit tree. Perhaps you have a client
> side configuration problem and don't have the 32bit tree enabled to
> retrive the 32bit version of the new libXp package to fill the 32 bit
> dep. If thats the case.. its a client configuration error and not a
> packaging one.

While somewhat true in general, in specific, I need to make sure all of
the new modular X libs are in the list of "multilib libs" properly.
Todo++ for today

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux