On 11/15/05, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If suspend was 100% reliable, I'd agree. For a lot of systems, > we may never get them working due to lack of hardware specifications > to wake the drivers up on resume. (Video drivers are particularly > bad in this area). I'm sure its going to be the hard thing to do... but who said the right thing to do was the easy one? I'm sure the difficulties in hardware coverage are real, but I still haven't seen a smoking gun that init parallelization is going to be an instant win for boottime for the default case, the average case, the worst case or anything else worth noting. The introduction of the bootchart and the resulting optimization of the init process we have now and I don't see why parallelization is garunteed to improve on that. Considering all the other technical benefits to moving to a more sophisticated init, I just don't think boottime is a strong argument.. I don't think we really know what the impact on boottime is going to be. -jef"I thought the mark was 80% reliable"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
