notting@xxxxxxxxxx (Bill Nottingham) writes: >> > [there might be opposition to linking init with /usr/, but I >> > consider it outdated. we have initrd to mount our filesystems >> > today] >> >> I don't really want to have to rebuild initrd anytime I change network >> settings and such (think network shared /usr). > > OK, this is something I've been meaning to ask about - who > still uses network /usr, and why do you use that instead of > network / ? It's not only a network /usr. It is an issue with the traditional splitting of /, /usr and /var too. These filesystems can not be used by init but must be made available by it (which is a non-trivial task because it requires e.g. module-loading, fsck or lvm setup). Enrico -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
