Re: init observations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:

This is why we need to see initng booting a default set of services
side-by-side with a SysVinit.
Its very much an open question as to whether there is much win at all
here... and exactly which segment would be expected to benefit. Luke's
images don't  come close to telling a real comparitive story about
boottime. Out of all the potential benefits I see the boottime
argument as least compelling, and most speculative... so its probably
best not to focus on this item at all.
In the past, boot times have been a major complaint of ordinary consumers.

A few years back, we bought a computer for my sister-in-law. It came with Windows XP at about the time Win XP first came out. In six months they installed a huge amount of junkware on it, which finally made the machine inoperable. The last straw was a keyboard driver for a keyboard with idiot buttons (connect to AOL...) that put up a modal dialog box that asked if I wanted to upgrade the keyboard driver that stopped me from fixing another serious problem with the start sequence.

So, we think, they want to browse the web, let's set them up with Linux -- I think it was RH 9. At least they're not going to trash the machine by installing junkware.

Laura's first complaint about the machine was that it took forever to boot, and I realized she was right. I took about 2/3 of the stuff out of the boot sequence (HP laserjet drivers, asian language input methods...), and things got a lot better.

FC3 and RHEL 4 made a great leap forward. When I installed RHEL 4 on an old 400 MhZ machine, I booted the machine for the first time, turned my back on it, expected it to still be grinding, and was amazed to see that it was already up!

The starting and stopping experience makes a big difference in the experience of a computer. If it takes forever to boot your computer, you leave it on all the time, wasting electricity and being a bigger target for hackers. My pet peeve with Windows and MacOS X right now is that these operating systems usually don't shut down when I hit the shutdown button. They mollycoddle bad-behaving applications, so often I have to hang around for 5 minutes after a shutdown to make sure I haven't missed any dialog boxes. My wife often leaves our Mac on all night because she hits "shutdown" and doesn't hang around to close all my terminal windows, and I often find that my Windows machine at the office is still on in the morning after I thought I shut it down at night and took off in a hurry to catch the bus.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux