Le mardi 15 novembre 2005 à 15:36 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit : > I'm not convinced that parallel startup is such a great idea. A lot of > work will be required to get (and keep) dependencies straight. Also, is > it really a win? Firing off a dozen things at once does not make them > finish 12 times faster; it can make them take longer. Honestly, I don't care a little bit about the parallel part, but smarter service ordering (*not* hardcoded startup numbers) wouldn't be luxury. Anyone who tried to allocate a meaningful startup number to a service taking into account all its deps permutations knows what I'm talking about -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
