On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 16:23 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 11/15/05, Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Basically, can we have X up in 10s? :) > > I still don't understand exactly why this is the important goal. > Explain to me why the 10second to X goal on "reboot" is more important > than getting a robust suspend/hibernate working that doesn't require a > full boot up process at all? I can see why the fist 4 items in Luke's > list are technical wins for a less grotesque init process... but i > still don't get why getting to a login screen in under 10 seconds on a > full boot is noteworthy or highly desirable compared to a > suspend/hibernate that actually works across desktops and laptop > hardware. I agree. I have recently installed Rawhide on my laptop (IBM T40) and got gnome-power-manager with suspend to disk working (the only problem was the non-support for swap partitions identified by label, already in bugzilla but I can't remember the number) and it is superb. I now plan on pretty much never rebooting again. Kudos to all those who worked so hard to make the bits join up - kernel, hal, dbus, g-p-m! Keith. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
