On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:40:02AM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
(I sent my email before pulling down 'fedora-devel'; I saw there were
other responses that answer one of my questions.)
> > TL;DR, I don't know what this is.
>
> I asked a question about some of the main motivations behind Konflux: Is
> it the ability to build containers "natively? Or is it about "SBOM"
> (software bill of materials) and "hermetic builds" that provide an
> attestation report? Something else? I didn't get a direct answer to
> this, but the presenter (Mike McLean) said he was there to share how
> _he_ is using Konflux to build RPMs.
>
> Fair enough, but my question remains: did the Konflux project consider
> the option of investing this effort into Koji to produce the artifacts
> they need? Maybe it was already considered and ruled out due to valid
> reasons. If they're documented somewhere, I'd be glad to educate
> myself. If not, Konflux project folks: please consider documenting.
> It'll also answer questions the broader community might have.
Okay, Stephen Smoogen and Kevin Fenzi answer one of my main questoins:
- "It isn't a koji replacement, it is a Fedora Build System
replacement" (Stephen)
- "The idea isn't to just swap konflux in for koji and call it a day,
but rather to use konflux as a build pipeline [src.fp.o, sigul,
`bodhi`, et al]" (Kevin)
[...]
--
/kashyap
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
