On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I still think we should always require a changelog entry, so that that > the reason for the rebuild is always explicit. > > (In the normal case, there should never be a need for "trivial" > rebuilds, and rebuilds should be for cases when there really is an > imporant change. If your API or ABI changes all the time in a way that > is backward incompatible and no-change rebuilds are required, then > _that_ is the problem and something to reconsider. We shouldn't build > a system to make such cases silent.) It's a tradeoff. I'd very much like all spec file changes to be accompanied by a changelog entry. But for no-spec-change rebuilds? I'm not sure it's worth it to *require* changelog entries for those, when it costs us free nothing-to-do-at-all rebuilds. (Yes, I did change my mind on this since the rpmautospec stuff was discussed.) Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
