Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Do., 20. Feb. 2025 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones
<rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:17:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I
> > recently got an idea.
> >
> > One of the common needs for provenpackagers is to simply "bump and
> > rebuild" a set of dependencies.
> >
> > All packagers are already able to build anything (except a very
> > specific and small set of specially-signed packages). However, to
> > bump the package, they need commit rights. For that reason,
> > provenpackager rights are often required.
> >
> > With the wide adoption of %autorelease, such bump commits are empty,
> > which should be easy to verify.

Wide, well, ...

> > What if we allowed all packagers to push empty commit to any
> > package? That should eliminate *some* need for provenpackager
> > access. We would also communicate in our policies that such bumps do
> > not require prior agreement with the maintainers to avoid confusion
> > about "what are we allowed to do".
>
> Seems like a sensible proposal.  Some possible modifications:

Good so far.

>  - Limit this only to rawhide?
>
>  - If we don't restrict it only to Rawhide, should we encourage the
>    packager to preserve ffwd to the rawhide branch, if that is
>    currently the case?  [Whatever the technical term for that is.]
>

That is an issue due to how we use git to drive builds without a
common guideline for branch usage (fast forward merges only, arbitrary
merges, merge down vs up, cherry-picks with diverging branches,...).

For example:
Package A in F42 has a mass rebuild commit on top of F41.
Packager B wants to bump both with an empty commit for a rebuild.
Does maintainer of A want non-diverging branches at the expense of a
bogus "f42 mass rebuild" commit in the f41 branch?

Also, %autorelease does not quite fly with merges yet (release
numbering, exclusion of bogus commits from changelog).

Michael
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux