Neither python-yarl nor python-uvloop is currently in EPEL10, so these
would fall under the normal EPEL package request process,
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/. I do
agree that EPEL10 branching should be based on the latest versions in
Rawhide in these cases.
On 2/20/25 7:05 AM, Romain Geissler via devel wrote:
Hi Ben,
I am not maintainer/co-maintainer for any of these packages so I cannot give you any consent.
On my side I had submitted the pytho-yarl & python-uvloop upgrades in anticipation of their branching in EPEL 10, as I would need these dependencies (and python-aiohttp) in RHEL 10. So would it be ok to include EPEL 10 in addition to Fedora 42/43 in your request ?
Thanks,
Romain
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
