On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:34:51AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 17:44, Kevin Fenzi <[1]kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree with downthread folks that that seems like way too high a > failure rate to enable gating on. However, a few questions if I can: > > Yes the failure rate is quite high and most of these are real failures, > that we deal with in Fedora CoreOS. So I am reading this like, because the > tests are catching too many failures we should continue ignoring them 🫤 I think what is scaring people with the data you've provided is that we do not know which %/numbers of these failures are genuine failures that should gate the update because they are bugs vs infrastructure/pipeline issues. Would you have a way to distinguish between the two? Basically a failure vs error output. The push-back I'm hearing is more toward: there are a lot of failures here and if they are all related to infrastructure issues then we're going to cause disruption without a clear benefits. Now if you're able to say: "95% of these errors are genuine bug that today are impacting our users despite our pipeline having found it and 5% are infrastructure related", that's a different story :) My 2cts, Pierre -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
