Re: retiring basesystem package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> You can see the problem in this attempted build:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128944651
> 
> The buildSRPMFromSCM task fails with:
> 
> DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
> DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem 1: package dnf5-plugins-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires ld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-plugins-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires ld-linux-aarch64.so.1(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-plugins-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires rtld(GNU_HASH), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-plugins-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.38)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - conflicting requests
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides basesystem needed by glibc-2.40.9000-35.fc42.aarch64 from build
> DEBUG util.py:459:   Problem 2: package dnf5-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires ld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires ld-linux-aarch64.so.1(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires rtld(GNU_HASH), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package dnf5-5.2.10.0-1.fc43.aarch64 from build requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.38)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - conflicting requests
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides basesystem needed by glibc-2.40.9000-35.fc42.aarch64 from build

Indeed. Apparently I was too hasty with the retirement. The package is
being unretired, so this be resolved soon.

Zlopez and yselkowitz: thanks for handling this and sorry for causing
the problem.

Zbyszek
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux