On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:51 PM Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems like the inclusion of rust-smallvec on this list might have > been an error, since "fedrq wr rust-smallvec*-devel" gives a very large > number of results that aren’t subpackages of rust-smallvec itself. You are correct, this should have been "smallstr", not "smallvec" (typo on my side). While smallstr depends on smallvec, nothing depends on smallstr itself any longer. > ----- > > I know that members of the AI/ML SIG are interested in packaging > python-safetensors, which would require rust-safetensors (and, I think, > is the reason it was originally packaged). I was chatting with them > about it on Matrix just a few days ago. > > The first step would be getting rust-safetensors up to date, > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-safetensors/pull-request/1. > > I am not sure when or if someone will *actually* do the packaging work > for python-safetensors and put it up for review, but it does seem worth > keeping rust-safetensors around a bit longer in order to support that > possibility. Sounds good to me. I had missed that discussion (and your PR, sorry!). I'll add it to the list of packages that we want to keep. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
