Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:23 PM Jan Drögehoff sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I'm generally in favor of this, especially since it would establish a status quo that could benefit other languages where the usual way of dealing with dependencies is incompatible with distributions. > > You are aware that 1) this request is explicitly targeting Golang > packages only, and 2) building with vendored dependencies is *already* > allowed (regardless of language ecosystem) when not doing so would > place an undue maintenance burden on the packager? yes to 1, I think I know what you are talking about with 2 but as I read the main guidelines you are allowed to vendor dependencies but it is very much discouraged, though I am unsure where you got the burden part from. > In particular, with zig stuff, I doubt that it's actually reasonably possible to build > without vendored dependencies due to the relative immaturity of the > library ecosystem (and compiler). > Fabio With zig its not even a matter of immaturity but the fact their dependency system is designed around loose bundles which makes it pretty much impossible to package pure zig libraries without turning it into a ton of work for packagers. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
