On 24. 01. 25 22:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
Note that side tags aren't the only issue. Sometimes a maintainer
commits a bump to git but doesn't build it in a side tag or rawhide,
for whatever reason. Sometimes a package is*built*, but gated from
Rawhide by automated tests, but then the mass rebuild effectively
overrides the gating (we found several cases like this). Just checking
side tags isn't gonna catch everything. I really think the appropriate
check is 'was the build most recently tagged into fXX built from the
current git commit? if not, don't rebuild this package, yell for manual
intervention'.
Generally, this sounds like a good idea.
However, note that is is not uncommon for (proven)packagers to commit stuff
that will only eventually get built. We might discover that the number of
packages that we yell at for no good reason is too high.
As an example of a big chnage, I think the SPDX commits were pushed but not built.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
