On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:25:18PM -0300, Rafael Jeffman wrote: > Some of these packages might have the same issue as > softhsm/opendnssec as they use the same user, but, > currently user GECOS is different on both packages, > causing systemd-sysuers to fail (or warn). This is a preexisting bug in softhsm and opendnssec. In fact, it might be a ecurity issue, since two services will run under the same user. I'm not familiar with those packages, but in general there are two options: - if the user shall be shared, let on of the packages define the user and have the other package add Requires:user(…). - if the user shall not be shared, use a different user name in one or both packages. The mechanism to create the users doesn't materially change the situation. If anything, the warning we'll now get from sysusers, if both packages are installed at the same time, is good, because it makes the problem easier to see. > IMHO, an approach similar to SPDX change should be made. A similar approach is being made: as mentioned in my original mail, I plan to open pull requests against packages. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
