On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 2:30 PM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1. Koschei is under resourced and turning it on for every package would pretty much make it a 'why is nothing working in Fedora' like every other good idea we add to the build system. > 2. Getting it resourced would require planning and funding which would need to cover: > a. the number of packages and amount of rebuilds needed will require some amount of memory/cpu/etc scaling. > b. dealing with the various package sets that koschei might break due to bootstrap needs > c. growing the developer count to working on koschei full time versus a 'I was working on this 4 years ago but I have been assigned other duties so have 0 hours' > d. deal with the political footballs of 'everything should move to Konflux', 'why are you changing something we had working for a whim', and 'I think Fedora should just use <OBS, yocto, etc> build system instead'. Would you be surprised that, actually, *every package* is already tracked by koschei, and nothing has exploded? Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
