Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mikel Olasagasti:

> Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant
> shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to
> vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure
> from our current guidelines [2].

> [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3330
> [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_bundled_or_unbundled

What's the benefit of vendoring over a build system that supports
offline builds against un-vendored dependencies?

I expect Konflux <https://konflux-ci.dev/> to have this capability
(although the documentation is a bit buzzword-heavy, so it's hard to
tell whether it's actually included).  There's a Fedora SIG for it:
<https://github.com/konflux-ci/community/blob/main/sigs/fedora.md>

Thanks,
Florian

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux