Re: Idea proposal for next mass rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 4:37 PM Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:44 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > So if you see packages that *change* (either their dependencies, or
> > their contents - but ignoring codegen differences with new compiler
> > versions etc.) between the last build before the mass rebuild and the
> > build performed during the mass rebuild, that's a sign that the update
> > was not pushed "correctly" in the first place, IMO.
>
> I would agree.  So, the question is, can
> "we" change something to try to make
> doing the "correct" thing easier?

I think you're thinking of something else here.
I was mostly referring to breaking changes that are pushed and built
in isolation, and not handled via multi-build updates / side-tags.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux