On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The only way that works, is what mockchain does: build the packages in > > random order. if any fails, repeat while at least one package in the loop > > succeed. > > So, this is an interesting idea. Perhaps we should start doing this for > mass rebuilds? It should be pretty easy to wait for it to finish, gather > all the failed ones and resubmit them, see if any worked, if so, > resubmit again. This would of course make things take longer and would > be a waste of cpu/etc, and it would generate more notification noise to > maintainers, but it might save work in the end? Most of the failing > packages would likely fail pretty fast too. Isn't this what is hapenning already? We can categorize the current alphabetical order as (one of the possibilities of pseudo-) random order. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
