Re: rpmlint+readelf corrupted interpreter on generated binaries

[Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <carlosrodrifernandez@xxxxxxxxx>]

Now I recall, it was happening in Zulu CI for my package, and all I 
could do was to ignore it as known issue while waiting for the rpmlint 
update. No workaround.


On 1/15/25 8:33 AM, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> Thank you Miro,
>
> I was certain that I had sent a fix for that to rpmlint. The problem 
> went away in my package in the CI (bodhi or Zulu, can't recall), 
> perhaps rpmlint was updated for the affected CI back then or was 
> removed from the gating/ci pipelines, or I removed rpmlint from the 
> gating/ci. I don't recall what the solution was back then.
>
>
> On 1/15/25 5:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 01. 25 10:18, Robin Jarry wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I found out that rpmlint errors out without producing any meaningful 
> > > result when the analyzed RPMs contain binaries:
> > >
> > > <mock-chroot> sh-5.2# strace -f -e trace=execve -s 65536 rpmlint 
> > > build/RPMS/aerc-*.rpm
> > > ...
> > > [pid   107] execve("/usr/bin/readelf", ["readelf", "-W", "-l", 
> > > "/tmp/rpmlint.aerc-debuginfo-0.19.0-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm.5obt7_7n/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/aerc-0.19.0-1.fc42.x86_64.debug", 
> > > "--debug-dump=no-follow-links"], 0x7fe85e1a3590 /* 27 vars */) = 0
> > > ...
> > > E: fatal error while reading 
> > > aerc-debuginfo-0.19.0-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm: 'utf-8' codec can't decode 
> > > byte 0xe4 in position 455: invalid continuation byte
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Relevant package versions:
> > >
> > > binutils-2.43.50-9.fc42.x86_64
> > > file-5.45-8.fc42.x86_64
> > > gcc-14.2.1-6.fc42.x86_64
> > > rpmlint-2.5.0-10.fc42.x86_64
> > >
> > > I suspect this is a bug in binutils/files which should not print 
> > > binary code in lieu of the interpreter name. But maybe the culprit 
> > > is in gcc.
> > >
> > > If anyone has an idea, I'd like some help.
> >
> > This should be fixed in rpmlint 2.6 currently available in rawhide.
> > I see you actually use rawhide, so just updating rpmlint should do.
> >
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/1147
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-59cc5ecf54
> >
> > Pending (lack of) user feedback, I plan to update rpmlint in Fedora 
> > 41 as well, after a while.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue