On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 21:07 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 01. 25 20:43, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It's a real failure. They're all showing up now because of a part of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers > > landing. Seehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337007#c1 and > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/pull-request/61 . > > For the record, I am aware of this change causing it (I should have probably > explicitly say that, I CCed the change owners). > > I just wasn't sure if the user/group Provides aren't "magical" in some sort -- > e.g. dnf on F42+ treating them specially by creating the user/group, but I > guess the respective Provides must actually exist. Yeah. Basically AIUI the *requires* are magical, the *provides* are magical *if you create users and groups the recommended way*, but if you don't, you have to add the provides manually. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
