Re: F42 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 / x86_64 Architecture (v2) (self-contained)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 12 January 2025 21:25:17 Central European Standard Time Zbigniew 
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > My concern is that this defeats most methods of observability. It's
> > essentially the same as the double-fork problem we used to have with
> > system services. The stub will fork out and exec a new binary, which
> > means you lose track of the binary and can't reliably trace it.
> 
> Why do you think it would fork? There should be just one process
> that executes the loader code and then something else.

Right - without having seen any code, my expectation would be for the helper 
to poke around a bit in the filesystem and then do an `exec()` of the actual 
binary.

Best regards,
Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux